Translate

Tuesday 30 April 2013

No-Wash Shirt Doesn Stink After 100 Days


 For Discovery News


The clothing company, called Wool&Prince, was started several months ago by Portland, Oregon native Mac Bishop two of his friends. Their button-down shirt prototype was made from wool put through a special process to make it soft, wrinkle-resistant and odor-free. While they don’t reveal what techniques are used to achieve this, Bishop documented wearing one of the shirts for 100 days in a row here. (Hat tip to Gizmodo.)
Bishop extolls the benefits of sheep wool, and talked with Margaret Frey, an associate professor of fiber science and apparel design at Cornell University about it in a Skype video. Australian sheep have been bred to have fine, soft fibers for an even flat fabric, Frey said. “It doesn’t have that itchiness that we might have associated with wool.”
Still, I’m highly skeptical about the shirt’s odor-free properties after seeing a GIF of Bishop next to a smoker, but will have to take his word for it since nobody I know has tried the shirt out yet. The company recently created a Kickstarter campaign to sell the shirts at $98 apiece so they can raise enough to place an order with the factory.
Living in Colorado, I’ve accumulated a few really nice albeit expensive wool items for outdoor use, including base layers and socks. Washing seems to reduce their smell-resistance, though. The pieces have a vaguely sheep-like smell after they’re gently cleaned and hung up to dry. Plus the socks could walk home by themselves after several days of heavy, sweaty use.
If this NYC startup can branch out into socks and underwear that truly don’t smell after lengthy wear, then we’ll really talk. Summer and its putrid sweat is just around the corner.
Image courtesy of Wool&Prince

What Does the Internet Know About You?


 for TechNewsDaily 
As Rebecca Martinson knows, there’s no privacy on the Internet. When a profanity-laden rant she emailed to only her Delta Gamma sorority sisters made its way onto Gawker and into viral history, she was publicly mocked and forced to resign from the sorority. But the Internet is not only a place to be humiliated. It's also a place for people or companies to pick up even more information about you. That includes your address, gender, date of birth and, with a little sleuthing, your Social Security number and credit history.
That's been made clear in a recent spate of "doxing" (document tracing) of celebrities that revealed, for example, that Microsoft CEO Bill Gates had an outstanding debt on his credit card. But none of this information comes from hacking. It's either already public or accessible by, for example, paying an online people-finding service to get a Social Security number, and then running a credit check.
Then there's all the data you pour into social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram, Foursquare and others. Now employers can fire workers for expressing opinions they don’t like, strangers can stalk you with mobile apps and college administrators can judge the quality of applicants by the number of drinking photos posted to their account.
Aleecia L. McDonald, director of privacy for the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford University, said people are grappling with the idea that their information has a secondary use. “The issue isn’t so much that information is out there and people can see it,” she said. “On Facebook, that’s the point. But it’s when that information gets used in a new and different way.”

It's All Public

Many gun owners felt that secondary use of private information when they saw an interactive map published by the Journal News of White Plains, N.Y., that listed the name and addresses of everyone in two New York state counties with a gun permit. A maplisting the names, addresses, phone numbers and social media accounts of Journal News reporters, including the author of the original story, was circulated online in retaliation. At least one county refused to turn over pistol permit records, citing the possibility of “endangering citizens.”
However, the records are all public. There is no law against publishing them either in print or online, even if it makes some uncomfortable.
“I can use Zillow.com and see home prices for everything up and down the neighborhood,” McDonald said. “Sure, all that information was available at City Hall, but I wasn’t going to look it all up [in person] because that takes effort.”
When real estate search site Zillow first came out, many people were shocked at the amount of information on it — including the price paid for homes and names of owners. Zillow has since backed down from publishing names, but last year, it began listing homes going through the foreclosure process, which caused another firestorm of people looking to opt out. But all the information comes from public records. Zillow says it doesn’t list names, only properties; and it does not allow those with foreclosed property to opt out” of being published.
Other sites, such as Arrests.org, list mug shots by state. And some local police departments are now posting photos of recent arrests on Facebook. Now with the Internet and databases, public records are easy to distribute and see.

Social Oversharing

Adi Kamdar of the Electronic Frontier Foundation cautions about the use of Facebook Graph Search, which allows users to search information from news feeds of friends and those users with settings set to public on Facebook. Now anyone can look for, for example, single women living in San Francisco who share their taste for tapas and perhaps find a phone number and email address. Who needs Match.com anymore?
Facebook has also reportedly been working for the past year on a socially ambient mobile app — one that lets you literally track people or friends via a map and GPS. While the socially ambient aspect hasn’t appeared yet, it’s expected to surface, according to Bloomberg News, likely in a new version of the Facebook Home interface.
“There’s nothing you can do in the electronic world that your boss can’t find and you can’t be fired for,” said Lewis Maltby, president of National Workrights Institute. “I got a call today from someone who got fired because he was writing short stories on his own time (online) and apparently they were a little kinky.”
Maltby, whose organization fights for human rights in the workplace, said that today, people’s futures are in peril every time their boss or college admissions office looks on the Internet. That means users shouldn’t post photos of themselves with an alcoholic drink in their hand or espouse political views, because it can lead to a value judgment.
“You can still go online and say what you want, but you’re crazy if you do,” Maltby said.
Another problem today is social networks becoming a larger part of one’s life. To comment on articles, people frequently log into a Facebook account first. Others are finding that their Google+ social account is being attached to their Gmail account and will be needed to comment on apps or games on Google Play. Google+ accounts are also used to sign into YouTube and other Google sites. Many social networks are seemingly trying to end anonymous posting.
To preserve privacy, a person would have to walk away from Google or Facebook. “It’s a trade-off to some extent,” Kamdar said. “The more these services get adopted, the more you have to think, ‘My entire online presence depends on this corporation or this service I don’t want to opt into.’”
Recently Facebook Home was launched on Android devices, and many noticed that the interface logged online purchases and visits, although Facebook said that it doesn’t assign names to the information. Facebook is using customer loyalty cards' information and public records to sell to advertisers and marketers. However, Facebook Home isn’t hunting anyone down to do this; people themselves are opting to use an Android phone with the Facebook skin on it.

What You Can Do

Long-term solutions could be legal, regulatory or even codes of conduct for companies, said McDonald. The White House is now working on a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights, but there is still not a working draft of the bill, according to the New York Times.
Meanwhile, users can save themselves some headaches by understanding that whatever they place online will stay online. Nothing online is temporary; instead, it's more like an Internet tattoo. Martinson’s online (and likely late-night) outburst will follow her throughout college and possibly the workforce, according to CNN.
Keep all social networks set to the highest privacy settings even if you have to manually approve follow requests.
If posting to a forum or other online database, don’t use your real name or email address (or at least one you don’t mind people seeing).
Never give out your date of birth, phone number or physical address if you can help it.
Never give out your Social Security number. Many colleges, banks, brokerage houses and other companies now have alternative login IDs to use provided you ask for one. (However, not even colleges or banks are immune to hackers, so always monitor your credit for suspicious activity.)
Remember that what you post can be seen by others. Be careful of what you say and which photos are posted because it could potentially be seen by millions of people.
“A lot of data is coming from people directly,” McDonald said. “Lock down [social media] accounts to only friends. Being more mindful is the first step we can take before looking for other solutions.”
Image via Allison Joyce/Getty Images


BlackBerry CEO: Demand For Tablets Will Die Out in 5 Years

                                                        

BlackBerry (née RIM) has had a tough time in the tablet market to date, but according to the company's CEO, that doesn't matter because the market itself is doomed.
"In five years I don’t think there’ll be a reason to have a tablet anymore," CEO Thorsten Heins said in an interview Monday at the Milken Institute, according to Bloomberg. "Maybe a big screen in your workspace, but not a tablet as such. Tablets themselves are not a good business model."
That certainly sounds like a bold prediction considering that competitors like Apple sold nearly 20 million tablets last quarter and reports suggest that overall tablet shipments will outpace desktop shipments this year. Of course, BlackBerry has had a very different experience in the market: The company released the BlackBerry Playbook tablet in 2011 missing some key features like email, and sales limped along until it slashed the price of the device. BlackBerry shipped 370,000 Playbook tablets in the March quarter.
Heins and BlackBerry still appear to be weighing whether it makes sense to release a follow-up to the BlackBerry Playbook tablet. At the January launch event for BB10, Heins told reporters that the company will only release another tablet if it can "provide a value proposition that is not just hardware, but software, too."
Do you think Heins is right about the tablet market? Share in the comments.


Sunday 28 April 2013

The Perils of Speed Dating





Saturday 27 April 2013

Why We'll Never Meet Aliens


Why We'll Never Meet Aliens


If you combine all our current knowledge of statistics and astronomy, it's nearly comical to believe we're the only intelligent life in the universe. It's easy to get lost in the numbers thrown around - there are billions of stars and planets in our galaxy and billions of galaxies. Humans are rather bad at fully understanding such large numbers.

Despite where this article might lead, it isn't really about science - its about thinking big. Big enough to consider that if there are any aliens with the ability to come visit us, they would almost assuredly not care to.
Stephen Hawking, the famous physicist, said in an interview that aliens visiting us would be similar to Christopher Columbus first landing on North America (not a good event for native Americans). His idea being that they would come for our resources, not with any particular purpose of friendship.

There are a few problems with that thought however. To introduce the idea, consider most any space movie in existence. Movies are of course, just movies, but they have shaped our thinking about meeting aliens. And small thinking it is indeed.

From what movies tell us, it would seem that scientists from alien races pretty much focused 
on 3 primary technologies: faster-than-light travel, energy weapons, and artificial gravity. Movies don't highlight artificial gravity much  because given our limited view, we pretty much expect gravity to just work and shooting a movie without it would be an unnecessary pain. So, screw it, all movie alien races invented artificial gravity.

There's a lot of implied technology thereafter (i.e. movie aliens don't often get sick and seem to not worry about eating) but that's not the fun stuff to think about. Lasers, phasers, and pew-pew-energy-blasters however, are fun to think about.

Did you ever wonder though - why these same scientists who made these neato energy weapons never bothered to develop targeting systems? They still rely on crappy biological reflexes to aim them. It's even sillier when alien robot/cyborgs that can outperform humans in every other way somehow still aren't so great at aiming their phaser zapper. They miss just as much as the humans do, and by that I mean - a lot. Of course, Star Wars would have been a short film if every shot stormtroopers made hit Han Solo but it would have made more sense.

Its actually rather ridiculous when you think about it - we (as in current state of human tech) already have automated targeting systems that work well with our doofy bullet-guns. We literally have targeting systems in existence today better than anything you saw in Star Wars.

Truth is, given how far along we already are - by the time humans develop usable energy weapons - we'll have awesome targeting systems to match. We won't miss. It is with fantastically geeky sorrow that I proclaim that there'll never be an energy pistol or rifle I'll get to shoot. Sure, there'll be energy weapons. Sure, they'll shoot. But it won't be me "aiming" them. They'll darn well be perfectly happy aiming themselves. Chances are I'll probably just be running away.

Movies get to ignore whatever they wish. However, reality dictates that science tends to advance in all directions at the same time. Not only because there's some level of constant pressure in all directions, but because advances in one field often accelerate many others (much like the invention of the computer accelerated all other fields of human science).

If Stephen Hawking is right, then he is saying a race of aliens have, at a minimum, perfected faster-than-light travel (or be willing to travel for several thousands of years at sub-light), conquered longterm biological effects of space radiation, and mastered extreme long distance space navigation just to come to earth and steal our water.

Another consideration that I rather enjoy is that if aliens would come here for resources, then that inherently implies an economic model into their decision. By definition, they need and value resources. Consequently, coming here to get them must have been their most economical choice. Getting them somewhere closer to home or manufacturing them must be more "expensive" (in some sense of the word) than the cost of them traveling all the way here, gathering our resources (probably atomizing us in the process), and flying them home.

While not impossible, that seems like an unlikely set of events - both technologically and economically. Again, even we have (expensively) already mastered alchemy. We even have the tech to create matter from energy. Imagine that tech in a hundred years, or two hundred, or whenever it is you think we'll be able to travel several light years for a mining expedition. What would be cheaper and better, forge the plutonium at home or send a galactic warship with thousands or warriors (and miners) to some far off planet?

From where we are now, we're not even close to being able to get to Proxima Centauri (the closest star to us besides the sun) much less a place where we think there's an actual planet. Even the technology required even to get us to Proxima Centauri in less than, say, 1000 years would require tech orders of magnitude from what we have. Propulsion, sustainability, radiation protection, nanotech - you name it.

Comparatively (and no disrespect to NASA) our existing space program involves us putting bombs underneath rocket-ships, blowing them into space with enough air supply for a few weeks, and bringing them back before the astronauts lose too much bone mass and/or the Tang runs out. If getting humans to another star system is a 100 on some "technology ability scale", we're a 2 which is not comparatively far ahead of say, poodles - who are probably at a 1.

The idea that they might come to Earth to colonize hits a similar argument. You could argue that terraforming (or xenoforming for them I suppose) could be a technology more advanced than FTL travel. With that assumption, you could imagine an alien race within the technological sweet spot of knowing how to travel across the universe but not alter planets to suit their biological needs. Coming to colonize Earth (again while likely blasting us into being "no longer chemically active organic matter") could make sense. But this ignores the fact that several other requisite technologies would probably make their need to colonize obsolete.
Before they had FTL travel, they likely spent many decades traveling at less that light speed. Even if not, chances are their ships are quite hospitable to themselves. In fact probably more like sailing biodomes than ships - someplace they could live indefinitely. But a biodome is probably the wrong inference - assuming their bio-scientists were at work while their space-propulsion engineers were perfecting FTL, they would likely have quite minimal external environmental needs. Stuff like air and food has long been technologied away.

The only thing something like Earth could give them is a place to stand on. Xenoforming a planet might be out of their reach, but creating ships to live in is by definition, well within their reach. The home-iness of living on a planet probably is questionable. It won't be as hospitable as their own ships.

So why else might they want to come here? Maybe they want to trade with us. Well, yeah, right. If you've gotten this far it's obvious we have no tech that would interest them. Maybe we'd be able to trade them some local arts and crafts or pottery or something - but other than that, they won't be interested in our childish technology.

Well, maybe they want to study us? Well, maybe. It seems probable that if they were on a mission to study life forms, we would not be the first planet they would have visited. Chances are, they've seen other life forms already. Probably some at least similar to us. Statistically speaking, we might be interesting but not all that interesting.

Oh yeah - and statistically speaking - what about statistics? Remember, my thesis is that all fields of science tend to advance simultaneously. That includes math and statistics. In order to make FTL ships, pew-pew-lasers and artificial gravity you're going to need math (and computers) that are light years ahead of ours.

Let's say they could use their super-advanced Hubble telescope, and see our solar system (at some point in the past). They'd see earth in the goldilocks zone for life. They'd know its land and atmospheric composition. They'd see it's oceans and know the planet's temperature variations. They'd see Jupiter acting as a bodyguard soaking up dangerous asteroids.

Even today, if we saw such a solar system, we'd have a pretty good idea that life could be there. If our math, statistics and knowledge of other life forms was 1000 times more advanced, how accurately could we predict that the life forms there would have 2 nostrils? How close could we come to guessing exactly what those life forms would be like?

And if we couldn't get exact - how close would we care to? Does it really matter? In other words, with enough data and statistics (the foundation of what humans like to call "machine learning" or "artificial intelligence") they already know we're here. Just like we know there was water on Mars or high temperatures on Venus.

Even with that however, we're still thinking too small. It's not just their science and tech that's advanced - you need to expect that they have too.

Twenty years ago if I asked you how many feet were in a mile (and you didn't know) you could go to a library and look it up. Ten years ago, you could go to a computer and google it. Today, you can literally ask your phone.

It's not a stretch at all with the advent of wearable computing that coming soon - I can ask you that question and you'll instantly answer. The interesting part of that is that I won't know if you knew the answer or not - and more importantly, it won't matter. If information is reliably fed directly to you from an external source, there'll be no advantage to remembering anything.

How many years before we have a brain interface to Google? You'd know everything. And its not crazy to think that soon after we'd find ourselves limited by how slow our brains process information. The obvious next step being to augment our brains, our thinking, and in the process - augment who we are. That's what our scientists will be working on then (and of course, are actually already working on).

How would you change if you had instant brain-level access to all information. How would you change if you were twice as smart as you are now. How about ten times as smart? (Don't answer, truth is, you're not smart enough to know).

Now, let's leap ahead and think about what that looks like in 100 years. Or 1000. Or whenever it is you'll think we'd have the technology to travel to another solar system. We'd be a scant remnant of what a human looks like today. Movies like to show aliens with over-sized heads and that may well be the case, but not because of biological evolution. Technological evolution will have long surpassed the snail-pass of biological evolution by then (read most any Ray Kurzweil book to hear this a lot).

The question of why aliens might "want to come here" is probably fundamentally flawed because we are forming that question from our current (tiny) viewpoint. The word "want" might not apply at all to someone 1000 times smarter than us.

If we discovered a fish-like creature on Europa today it would be fascinating for us to study it. If however, we were 1000 times smarter and had spent the last 1000 years finding fish-like creatures across the galaxy, and could with 99.99% accuracy predict the exact existence of such creatures from light-years away, it probably wouldn't be all that interesting to go study another one.

The bottom line is that if an alien race is capable of getting here, all the other technology they've requisitely developed in the meantime would make the trip unnecessary at best - and more than likely, simply meaningless.

We're just not as advanced or as important as we like to think. In the end, there's no compelling reason to think they'd be interested in meeting us - we simply think too small.


2 Ways to Fix the Typing-on-Touchscreens Problem


 for MIT Technology Review

Considering how much typing on a glass touchscreen blows in comparison to using hard keys, it's easy to imagine how Blackberry saw the first iPhone back in 2007 and thought, "Bah, this isn't a threat." We all know how that turned out. But typing on glass still blows, and voice dictation on mobile devices (while pretty awesome) isn't a good fit for every situation. So how can we un-blowify touchscreen typing? Two interesting software-design approaches have recently emerged: one rethinks how the keyboard looks, while the other rethinks how the keyboard acts. (Spoiler alert: I think the latter has more potential.)
KALQ, an experimental system developed by a team of HCI researchers including Per Ola Kristensson (whose distraction-reducing display interface I wrote about here), takes the standard QWERTY keyboard layout and redesigns its layout to reflect mobile-device usage patterns (well, one in particular: gripping a phablet or tablet in landscape view with both hands and typing with one's thumbs). KALQ takes its name from its redistribution of the QWERTY keys. It splits the keyboard into two mini-keyboards: one on the left, one on the right, each positioned within easy striking distance of the thumb on each hand, with the letters laid out in such a way to maximize efficiency. For example, the researchers discovered that oft-typed words like "on," "see," "you," and "read" must be typed solely with one thumb if the QWERTY keyboard is simply split in half. Typing entire words (even short ones) with one thumb is slow and awkward. So they redistributed the keys across the two "boards" to make a better ergonomic fit for these word-usage frequencies.
The result? A 34% boost in typing speed. The catch? It'll take four to eight hours of training to be able to use it at a level of fluency equivalent to a standard QWERTY keyboard, and more hours to get faster.
Meanwhile, a startup called Syntellia has created a soft keyboard called Fleksy that is also dedicated to making touchscreen typing less cumbersome. It's still a QWERTY keyboard, though. Instead, Fleksy uses a beefed-up autocorrection/prediction engine under the hood to minimize typing errors. It's so beefed-up, in fact, that you can use it to type accurately without even seeing the keysSo blaze away as fast and out-of-control on your glass screen as you like — Fleksy's software will mop up your mistakes. (In theory. I tried it myself on iOS and was encumbered by the weird gesture it makes you use instead of hitting a spacebar button. If they'd kept that in, I'd have been much faster.)
Both KALQ and Fleksy are flawed but technologically impressive solutions to similar problems. KALQ, though, seems like a design solution wrought in a vacuum. It asks, What if we could redesign keyboards from scratch to better fit how we use mobile devices now? The trouble is that keyboards don't exist in a vacuum, and they don’t only exist now. The QWERTY layout is an interface that, over the past 135 years, has become culture: it exists across many domains, anywhere that text input goes into a machine, not just touchscreen mobile devices in 2013. It's what people expect when they have to or want to input text with their hands. Sure, the original technological reasons for that QWERTY layout— to prevent jams in the physical mechanism of late-19th-century metal typewriters — no longer exist. But what does exist, and has for well over a century, is the cultural expectation that keyboards equal QWERTY.
So, do you take that fact into account when designing a solution to this problem — or ignore it? There's no "right" answer, but the Fleksy approach seems less likely to fail completely, because it doesn't seek to shrug off all that cultural weight that QWERTY has. If the real design problem being addressed is, "How can we make soft-key typing faster?" then you might wonder, "what slows people down when typing on soft keys?" Is it ergonomics or something mechanical — a feature of the system? Or is it an outcome of those ergonomics? What slows me down when I type on a touchscreen isn't the lack of haptic feedback or suboptimal key arrangement. What slows me down, really, is the outcome of compensating for the limits of the system on glass screens — that is, my own error-correcting behavior: I have to stare at the keys to make sure I'm pressing the right ones, move more slowly, or back up and correct what I mis-typed. So if this manual error-correcting behavior is what is slowing me down in this context, perhaps the solution is not to redesign the keyboard into a wholly-unfamiliar-but-somehow-technically-optimized arrangement, and ask me to learn it, even though this new learning will not apply to any other manual text-input task I'll ever encounter — but simply let me keep doing what I already know how to do, while relieving me of that error-correcting burden. Keep the QWERTY — the cultural artifact I'm already an expert user of — but add software that minimizes my error —so I don't have to slow down. This is what Fleksy aims to do.
Granted, KALQ's alternative layout is a logical reaction to the fact that, when you try to solve the ergonomic problem (splitting the keyboard into two pieces that live on either side of a device's screen, easily accessible by your thumbs), some of QWERTY's advantages simply break — so there was no choice but to rearrange the keys in order to commit to that ergonomic solution. In light of Fleksy's approach, though, I just wonder if that tradeoff is really worth it.
And Fleksy doesn't work perfectly yet either — not even close. But that design approach somehow seems more human-friendly, in the larger context of keyboard usage. It's to their credit that both Fleksy and KALQ's creators have not simply conjectured from armchairs about what would, could, or should work: they've put in an impressive amount of research into identifying and implementing their respective solutions. Still, that research — and the solutions it suggests — derives from asking very different questions about what this typing problem really is.
Image via iStockphotoErikona
This article originally published at MIT Technology Review here

Can an App Steal Your Credit Card Data?

                                                                     
Thieves are now using an app, in conjunction with near field communication (NFC), to swipe credit card information by waving their phones at close proximity to a victim's wallet or jacket, according to a recent CBC News report. The process takes only a second, and because of its swipe-and-grab nature, it doesn't leave any evidence.
The report didn't specify exactly which app was being used, but it did mention the phone in the study was a Samsung Galaxy S III.
What's important to note is that the credit cards in danger here are only those that use NFC for payment, like MasterCard PayPass or Visa payWave, which allow customers to tap their card to make quick purchases. You can contact your credit card company to see if your card is NFC-capable.

5 Apps to Improve Work Productivity

                                                                    

We all want more time. Time to finish our work, handle tedious errands and check off items from our ever expanding to-do lists. The problem is, the day's not getting any longer and our responsibilities seem to never stop growing.
The only thing we can do to work more efficiently is to know some very helpful shortcuts and pro tips. And whether you're working form home or remotely, there's a cheat sheet — so to speak — for any setting.
When it comes to apps to help along the way, take a peek at these tools to assist you in everything from remembering important data, scheduling meetings, handling payroll and even virtual assisting:
  1. Evernote: Remember everything. While you probably can't remember what you ate for lunch, this free service stores all of your notes, ideas, plans and photos in one easy-to-access platform. More right-brained? It even let's you draw, with its skitch tool. It's really simple how helpful this tool is: Store anything, acces it anywhere. Not enough for you? Well, the year-oldbusiness version of the app features all of that on a scale big enough for a whole company to use. And for all you security-heads out there, two-factor authorization is coming soon, so you can feel safe about where your data is stored.
  2. GoToMeeting: Host unlimited meetings, webinars or training from your iPad, iPhone orAndroid device. You can even share documents and your screen, and if you have a webcam, face time, too. Meetings hold up to 25 attendees and no matter your location this service offers conference calls from anywhere with an Internet connection. It's not free, but at as little as $49 per month or $468 per year, it might just be a worthwhile investment if you're looking for an upgrade from Skype.
  3. Cloudon: This iOS and Android app is a free cloud experience that basically gives you the power of Microsoft Office, Excel and PowerPoint to create and edit files on your tablet or smartphone. You can also access files you already keep in the cloud with Box, DropBox, Google Drive and Microsoft SkyDrive. This is a one-stop hub to create, manage and share your work with employees.
  4. Expensify: Remember those god-awful TPS reports from Office Space? That experience was so painful for the characters in the film that they ended up going AWOL on their jobs. Expense reports suck, so meet an app that makes that process sail a whole lot more smoothly. The software imports any bank or credit card statement, billable items like gas mileage and time, and neatly organizes expenses with custom categories and tags. You can even import receipts from services like Evernote. And the best part of this expensing service? It's not expensive. It's free and available on the iPhone, iPad, Windows Phones and even BlackBerry.
  5. Dragon Mobile Assistant: Everyone wants an assistant, but most can't afford the expense. But a free assistant, with you at all times on your iPhone or Android device? Yes, please. The service is voice-directed dictation wherein you speak to text, make calls, schedule appointments, search or update social media accounts. And just like a real-life assistant, you can customize this tool with a name that, when called (or yelled), wakes the dragon. But fear not, Game of Thrones lovers, in this case, it's a very good thing.
Image courtesy of iStockphotocourtneyk

Tuesday 23 April 2013

8 Ways to Recycle Your Old Smartphone

Zoe Fox
What did you do with your old smartphone after you upgraded to the latest iPhone 5 or Samsung Galaxy III?
According to a November 2012 survey by Lookout, 62% of American households have old cellphones lying around, unused. Discarded iPhones alone account for $9 billion of unused goods in consumers' homes.
If you're among the 62% with dormant phones, we challenge you this Earth Day to come up with some creative gadget recycling solutions. We've rounded up eight ways you can recycle your old phone, from using it as an external hard drive to donating it to a worthy charity.
So what do you think: Will you give your old smartphone a second life, even though you've upgraded on to the newer model?

1. Donate Your Phone to the Troops

Non-profit Phones for Soldiers works to provide U.S. troops with a cost-free way to call home from their active stations. Through recycling partner Mindful eCycling, old mobile phones are traded in for calling cards and other communications devices.
Screenshot courtesy of Phones for Soldiers


Screen%2520shot%25202013-04-22%2520at%252010.44.24%2520am

2. Sell It on Glyde

Looking for a one-stop shop for selling back all the old tech in your home? Glyde lets you buy and sell a variety of devices, plus it compares the amounts you can fetch on its site with offers from Amazon, Apple and Gazelle.
Screenshot courtesy of Glyde


Screen%2520shot%25202013-04-22%2520at%252010.35.13%2520am

3. Put It on an Appstand

This picture frame for your iPhone 3 or 3GS turns your old iPhone into a lovely piece of home decor. Available on sale for $8.73, the Appstand lets you breathe new life into your outdated Apple smartphone.
Screenshot courtesy of Koyono/Appstand


Screen%2520shot%25202013-04-22%2520at%252010.22.26%2520am

4. Sell It Back to Apple

Apple will trade your old iPhone for an Apple gift card through its Reuse and Recycling program. Amounts vary depending on your phone's make and model.
Image courtesy of Flickr, Gene Hunt


Recycling%2520bin

5. Donate to Survivors of Domestic Violence

Verizon has collected more than 10 million phones since 2001 for victims of domestic abuse: one in four U.S. women, one in seven men and nearly 3 million children. To donate your old phone, drop it at a Verizon store, ship it or donate to a HopeLine phone drive.
Screenshot courtesy of Verizon HomeLine


Screen%2520shot%25202013-04-22%2520at%252010.47.25%2520am

6. Search Your Options With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

The U.S. EPA provides dozens of resources for recycling your old smartphone with its mobile, PC and television search engine. Depending on your device and make, the EPA surfaces optimal recycling options.
Image courtesy of Flickr, georgehotelling


Recycle%2520computers

7. Donate to the One Fund for Boston, via Gazelle

Boston-based Gazelle, known for its smartphone buy-back programs, is accepting donated items for the One Fund for Boston. If you select the Boston Marathon victims' relief fund as your preferred payment type, 100% of proceeds from your donation will go toward those most-affected by the marathon tragedy.
Image courtesy of Flickr, Nick Ledford


Boston

8. Send Your Phone to CTIA for Refurbishing

If your smartphone is still in good shape, the CTIA will clean, test and update it, then return it to certain retailers who will resell the device. Alternately, if your device doesn't need the complete refurbish, CTIA will clean it and put it up for resell. Phones unable to be refurbished or reused still get recycled for their reusable materials.
Image courtesy of Flickr, epSos.de


Recycling%2520bins


Engineers Call for Repairable Cellphones to Save Money, Environment


 Leslie Meredith
 for TechNewsDaily 

Reduce, reuse and recycle is the foundation of sustainable living. However, it's time to add another "R" to the list — repair.
Repairing electronic devices is equally as important as the other three green watchwords, the IEEE, a professional association for engineers, said in a statement. But most manufacturers must first make their devices more "repairable," the statement said.
In 2013, more than 1.7 billion mobile phones will be shipped to retailers. Each phone uses 165 pounds of raw materials in its manufacture and more than eight gallons of water in the making of its microchip. Extending a phone's life to four years through "modest design changes," could reduce the device's environmental impact by about 40%, IEEE said.
Phones that can be more easily repaired are good candidates for secondary markets, both in the United States and abroad. But repairability can also be a valuable feature in the short term. Considering this factor could do more than make you feel good about doing your part for the environment; it could also save you money.

Bring Back the Screwdriver

As some manufacturers make devices smaller and sleeker, the companies are also using more closed designs and materials that make the phones nearly unfixable, IEEE said.
"Simple things like utilizing openable cases, using screws rather than adhesives and providing easy access to parts that are most likely to break, like screens, greatly improve the repairability of cellphones," said Kyle Wiens, IEEE member and CEO of iFixit, an online do-it-yourself repair site for gadgets.
Still, some phones are more repairable than others. For instance, all you need is a Torx screwdriver to open the casing of the new Samsung Galaxy S 4 . That won't work on the new HTC One with its sealed aluminum body, or with an iPhone.

Friday 19 April 2013

7 Ideas For A Home Business


1. Personal Support Services For The Elderly

Over 2 million people over 75 live alone; 1.5 million of these are women and the population over 75 is projected to double in the next 30 years. Elderly people want to stay living in their own homes longer but need help with daily chores. They don’t all want regular carers but would like to know someone they could call on for help when they need it. Many of the elderly do not have family living close by and even if they do have their families support they don’t always want to call on them. My mother is elderly and most of her friends are too. Depending on how well her health is, she needs help with shopping, simple DIY tasks like buying and changing light bulbs and turning a mattress over, sorting out a room, making telephone calls for her, cutting toe nails or repotting the flower pots. Elderly people, particularly if they are hard of hearing, find the automated telephone and call centre services very difficult to deal with. For this work you need to be patient, caring and have gentle manner. It would be best to get CRB registered. For more information read this fact sheet for AgeUK.

2. Smart Phone Glass Repairer

What do we all take with us where ever we go? Our keys and our iPhone. According to eMarketer’s forecasts, the number of smartphone users in the UK will more than double between 2012 and 2016, from 19.2 million to 41.9 million. How many of us have ever chipped or cracked the glass? I’ve did this twice last year, my husband once and my son twice. Maybe we’re a clumsy family! It can cost around £50 to get it repaired, even more if the repairer comes out to you. If you’re practical, not fazed by technology and have a good manner with people then there is a market for this service in every town. To learn what’s involved in mending the glass on the iPhone, watch this video.

3. Gardening Services

If gardening is a passion of yours then there is always a demand for gardening services, particularly in the spring and summer. So, now is the  time to start. You don’t even need to have to be particularly knowledgeable as the client often knows what they want. You do need to be happy to work outside in all weathers and it will help if you have a vehicle to take away clearings. Combine this with some easy outside handyman services like painting and repairing the fence, cleaning the gutters and cleaning the pond and you’ll be in demand. A good way to start is to put some leaflets through doors, in the library, sport centres and church halls. If you live in Bournemouth let me know.

4. Host Some Foreign Students

If you have a spare room then this is a great way to earn some extra income. Rates can be £60-80 a week. Foreign students only stay for a short period of  time, from a couple of weeks to a few months, so you won’t get stuck with someone you don’t like. You can specify whether they are male or female, smokers or non-smokers. Most foreign students are looking for a room with breakfast and an evening meal included. They are happy to help themselves to the breakfast. Ideally, most students will need a reasonably sized room with a desk and chair to work at. Internet access will be preferred, ideally WiFi. To take on a student you need to be friendly, relaxed person as you will be sharing your home with someone else. Most students like to stay in their bedrooms when they are at home but you need to be happy to chat to them when they are around. If you are interested then you will need to contact the English Language schools in your area. University-list has a list of schools in the UK.

5. Childcare

There’s always demand for childcare services in an area. Clearly for this work you do need to like children and be experienced with children. If you are working with pre-school children you will need to be a registered childminder. If working with babies and toddlers does not appeal to you then there is demand for picking up and looking after much older children (between 5-13 years old) after school for just a couple of hours  in their own home. You will need a car and might need to be willing to cook a supper and help supervise the homework. If you are looking after a child in your own home for more than two hours then you will need to register with Ofsted. It includes medical, criminal and domestic safety checks. Babysitting is another way to earn some extra money if you can spare a couple of evenings. Parents are often looking out for older more responsible babysitters and will pay well for late evening, particularly if you can drive yourself home.

6. Dog Walking

If you like animals then dog walking is a great way to earn some extra money and keep fit. Clearly you need to prepared to be outside in all weathers and it helps if you have a vehicle to pick up the dogs. As your skills develop you can offer dog walking, day care, pet visiting, dog grooming and dog training. A dog walk is normally charged out at around £12 an hour. When I go walking my own dog in the morning, I often meet Alison with her pack of six dogs. She has been successfully running her dog-walking business Barkers of Westbourne for a couple of years. As well as dog-walking services, Alison sells organic dog food to her clients.

7. Private Catering

If you love cooking then there can be great extra earning opportunity to cook at private dinner parties or prepare delicious homemade frozen food, ready to put in the oven. Home made frozen food is very popular and it is difficult to get. COOK has a number of franchise shops selling homemade frozen food that are very successful but there is still plenty of scope here. Visit one of their shops and research what dishes they sell and which are popular. For this idea you will need to spend more time on marketing to make sure customers know about you. If this sounds too daunting and you enjoy baking cakes and biscuits you can earn quite a bit of extra money selling these at local fairs and gift shops, without too much effort. With food it pays to spend a little time on creating the brand and package that will work best for your business.
This list of home business ideas might seem a little obvious but sometimes we spend too long trying to think of over creative ideas when often the easiest ideas are all around us. These business ideas work, people are making money this way every day in your local community and there is enough demand for you to add yourself, with your own brand of uniqueness. They aren’t likely to make your rich but you could get started quickly and earn some extra cash. If you are keen and dedicated there is the opportunity to grow the ideas into bigger businesses.
Comment below and share your tips on profitably home business ideas.
If you found this article useful let me know by liking it. Thanks.